3D Printing for Robotics and Material Choices

Banner Image Courtesy of Sculpteo

3D printing has transformed how roboticists prototype and produce components. Rapid iteration, complex geometries, and low-volume custom parts are easier and cheaper than ever. But the material you choose shapes everything from strength and weight to wear, heat tolerance, and long-term reliability.

How Material Choice Affects Robot Performance

• Strength-to-weight ratio. Lightweight parts reduce actuator load and power consumption, but too light (or too flexible) reduces precision or structural integrity. Materials like carbon-fiber–filled Nylon or PETG blends offer higher stiffness with modest mass.

• Flexibility and damping. Some applications (end-effectors, bumpers, compliant mounts) need controlled flexibility. TPU and certain photopolymer elastomers provide impact absorption, reducing shock to sensors and gears.

• Creep and long-term stability. Polymers under sustained load can deform over time. For load-bearing structural parts, choose materials with low creep (e.g., certain nylons post-annealed, or engineering-grade thermoplastics).

• Thermal performance. Motors, power electronics, and localized heating require materials that tolerate elevated temperatures without softening or off-gassing. High-temp thermoplastics (PEEK, ULTEM) or metal 3D printed parts may be needed for hot zones.

• Wear and friction. Moving interfaces (gears, bearing surfaces) need materials with low wear or surfaces that can be plated or coated. Some filled nylons and certain photopolymer resins have better tribological properties than brittle plastics.

• Electrical and chemical properties. Insulating vs conductive materials matter for sensors and EMI-sensitive parts. Chemical resistance matters for robots in labs, outdoors, or exposed to fuels/solvents.

• Surface finish and tolerances. Additive processes differ: SLA gives high detail for sensor housings, FDM gives robust parts but with layer lines that affect seals and mating surfaces unless post-processed.

Comparison Table of Common Materials

Design Tips for Robotic Parts

• Design for the process: Respect minimum wall thickness, overhangs, and support removal constraints of your chosen process. SLS tolerates complex internal channels; FDM needs orientation planning.

• Orient for load direction: Print layers perpendicular to bending loads reduce delamination risk. For FDM, align layer lines with compressive loads, not tensile shear.

• Use fillets and radii: Sharp corners concentrate stress—add fillets at load paths and around screw bosses.

• Reinforce with ribs and honeycombs: Rather than thick walls, use ribs or lattice/infill patterns to improve stiffness while saving weight.

• Integrate inserts and fasteners: Design standard brass heat-set or ultrasonic inserts for repeated assembly; avoid thread-cutting into thin walls.

• Hybrid approach: Consider combining printed parts with CNC or metal components for precision mating surfaces or high-heat regions.

• Tolerance planning: Account for shrinkage and printer accuracy. For fit-and-assembly, design test coupons to validate tolerances before production.

Testing and Validation

Testing should be baked into the development cycle:

• Functional load tests. Apply expected static and dynamic loads, monitor deformation and failure modes. Use strain gauges for quantitative measures where needed.

• Fatigue testing. For moving parts and cyclic loads, run accelerated lifetime cycles (use higher frequency or load if safe) to detect creep/fatigue.

• Environmental testing. Thermal cycling, humidity exposure, chemical exposure, and UV testing reveal long-term behaviors.

• Tribology tests. For sliding surfaces, measure wear rates and friction coefficients; consider lubrication or coatings.

• Electrical/EMI checks. Validate sensor performance near printed enclosures; check for static buildup if electrostatic discharge is a risk.

• Assembly & fit trials. Verify threaded inserts, snap-fits, and mating parts across multiple builds to ensure consistent manufacturing tolerances.

• Iterative prototyping. Use rapid prints for early geometry checks, then move to production-grade materials/processes for final verification.

Risks and Mitigations

Common risks and how to address them:

• Brittle failure or delamination. Mitigate by switching to tougher materials (nylon, ABS), adjusting print orientation, increasing infill or using bonded/annealed parts.

• Creep under sustained load. Use materials with low creep (filled nylons, PEEK), add mechanical reinforcement, or redesign to move loads to metal supports.

• Heat softening. Keep hot components insulated, use higher-temp plastics or metals in heat zones, and add vents or heat sinks.

• Excessive wear. Use wear-resistant materials or apply coatings; add replaceable wear pads to sacrificially protect high-friction interfaces.

• Chemical degradation. Select chemically resistant polymers (e.g., certain nylons, PEEK) or use protective coatings/encapsulation.

• Inconsistent supplier quality. Validate materials from new suppliers with small batch testing and require certificates of analysis for critical parts.

• Regulatory/safety gaps. For medical, aerospace, or food-contact robots, ensure materials meet relevant certifications and sterilization requirements.